If this were to happen, their shot at the major leagues will be compromised, so they will be encouraged to be physically fit the most to be able to secure their future.
If they had to start paying players, the most probable result would be other programs suffering. Coupled with creating fair standards for compensation, education should be prioritized for these college athletes. To gain a good insight about this subject, let us take a look at the pros Pros of paying college athletes cons of paying college athletes.
It could be unfair to athletes of less popular sports. They lead hectic lives juggling academics, trainings and tournaments. Pros of Paying College Athletes 1. Tweet on Twitter College sports have already become huge, with thousands of people lining up to watch their favorite student athletes and teams play.
But do they even get recognition or royalty? The issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been one that comes up over and over, but is never truly solved. They will lose that hunger and passion that we see in college.
The money is put back into the school, which aids in advancing the campus, lowering tuition, and improving the school overall. A commonly heard point across the board of this debate is where the money should go.
This leaves one big question here, what about the players? Student-athletes are not employees, and their participation in college sports is voluntary. It will attract new talents.
Players of Northwestern Wildcats are considered primarily as athletes rather than students. The athletes that are playing are the heart of this business, so they should receive a piece of the profit. It could remove the tradition of college sports.
Attract more talent Why put your life on the line for something that pays nothing? Traditionalists also argue that college sports are designed to foster true sportsmanship and not so the athletes could profit from them.
College athletes are the ones going out to the field, putting their bodies on the line and winning games, and not the college, promoters and sponsors. Many college athletes are bribed with money by unethical coaches to switch universities. Also, there is an issue on equal pay among players in different divisions.
Physical sports, like basketball and football, are not for the weak. When the play well, the school makes even more money.
It is giving the athletes what they deserve. College athletes would be often drawn into corruption by agents and boosters who are willing to bribe them to play for other schools. It can make other students feel upset. It will pave the way for students to pay off their loans as soon as they finish college.
However, this of course comes with certain issues, particularly when it comes to the question whether college athletes should be paid for their performance. These prove that paying college athletes opens the door to multiple problems that would eventually hinder athletes from taking their studies properly, while their games would possibly set them up for failures in the future.
Paying college athletes has several pros and cons, and there has to be a balance between these factors before school authorities and collegiate sports officials make a decision.
It is a good business. Many people believe that it is more deserving and righteous that earnings from TV networks running the games should go back into the schools as a whole and not to the individual players. The amount of money going around college games is massive, with sponsorships, advertisements and even video games generating money for the National Collegiate Athletic Association NCAAwhich is a non-profit organization that oversees all collegiate sport activities in the US and controls how they are managed among affiliated schools.
Should they be deemed as free advertising, a simple fine print of the contract they signed upon enrollment? This is made from tickets to the sporting events, merchandise, booster funding, video games, and much more.
Paying college athletes may be beneficial to the students, but it can cause budget problems to schools that need to re-invest whatever they earned from college sports to provide better facilities and fulfill the academic needs of their students.The subject of paying college athletes is still a no-go.
But for the sake of arguments, many people offer their arguments on the topic. However, the decision whether to provide compensation to students or not is one that is difficult to resolve.
The debate of paying college athletes has been in the headlines for a while. Still, no final resolution has been made as to whether or not it is even morally correct to pay college athletes. It seems the conversation is here to stay.
The question, “Should college athletes be paid?” is re-hashed regularly. There are many advocates in favor of and many against the idea of paying athletes who play sports for their college or university.
We’ve got a breakdown of the pros and cons. The. College Athletes Getting Paid?
Here Are Some Pros And Cons. 03/29/ am ET Updated Mar 29, Below are a few potential pros and cons of paying college athletes.
Pros. The pros and cons of paying college athletes. College news. Admissions, Cost, Financial Aid, Scholarships, Dorms, Academics, Sports, Interviews, Students. As college athletic programs continue to generate millions of dollars in revenue for their schools, advocates for student-athletes have begun pushing for schools to pay their players, while opponents say that compensating athletes has the potential to ruin college sports.
Here are some pros and cons of paying student-athletes.Download